Legal Opinion

Arranco Shoes By Carmen, Inc. v. Calzados Milady, S.L.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 9, 1982No. 82-1262PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BASKIN, Judge.

Finding no excusable neglect which. might justify appellant’s failure to respond to process properly served upon its employee during the lengthy period appellant’s business was left in the care of its employee, and finding no abuse of discretion by the trial court, T.I.E. Communications, Inc. v. Toyota Motors Center, Inc., 391 So.2d 697 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Williams v. Stack, 366 So.2d 872 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), we affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s Motion to Set Aside Default and Default Judgment.

We remand, however, for a new trial on the question of damages. Appellant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. B/G AMUSEMENTS, INC. v. Mystery Fun HouseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. TIE COMMUNICATIONS v. Toyota MotorsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Scott v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. TALLMAN POOLS OF GA., INC. v. WoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Williams v. StackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. California Club Realty, Inc. v. LuccaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API