Williams v. Stack
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order setting aside a default. The motion to set aside the default did not allege the existence of a meritorious defense, and no proof was ever submitted, other than representations of counsel, concerning any legal excuse for the failure to respond to the complaint. As such the motion and proof were insufficient to justify setting aside the default. Clark v. Roberto's, Inc., 320 So.2d 870 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Winter Park Arms, Inc. v. Ak-*873erman, 199 So.2d 107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); Thomason v. Jernigan, 146 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962). Accordingly, the order is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Winter Park Arms, Inc. v. AkermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Clark v. Roberto's, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Thomason v. JerniganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
3Cited by4 opinions
- TIE COMMUNICATIONS v. Toyota MotorsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Vanguard Group, Inc. v. Vanguard Security, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Arranco Shoes By Carmen, Inc. v. Calzados Milady, S.L.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- OLYMPUS POOLS, INC, STATEN v. 30 DAY POOLS, LLC, THE POOL CONSULTANTS, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025