Legal Opinion

Hurt v. Dime Savings Bank

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 7, 1993No. CV 93-2895Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEXLER, District Judge.

Michael and Amber Hurt (“Plaintiffs”), brought this action against The Dime Savings Bank (“The Dime”), alleging racial discrimination in its 720(c) home refinance program. Michael Hurt is a self-employed owner of a small, black-owned business.

*31Pursuant to a complaint received from the Hurts, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), opened an investigation in this matter. On May 13, 1993, HUD issued an administrative subpoena duces tecum, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3611, requiring The Dime to produce for inspection its files…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. DaveyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. Delozier v. First National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986
  4. Baine v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API