Legal Opinion
Hooper v. Bell
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 7, 1948No. 11812PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is a suit brought by Everett Bell, plaintiff, against Warren Hooper, Marko Dizdar and Barney Horvich, doing business as the Phar-Tex Fruit Company. United States Casualty Company of New York, surety upon a bond executed for Phar-Tex Fruit Company, in conformity with the Texas Citrus Growers' Act, Article 118b, Vernon's Ann.Civ.Stats., Article 1700a-3, Vernon's Ann.Penal Code, was also named as defendant. Trial was to a jury and judgment rendered against the defendants, including the surety company, for the sum of $5,000. An additional recovery of $2,627.21, against the owners of Phar-Tex…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smoot's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Texas Seed & Floral Co. v. Chicago Set & Seed Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- J. C. Engelman, Inc. v. Sanders Nursery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Chadbourne v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
- Beaumont Cotton Oil Mill Co. v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bohman v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- P & L Contractors, Inc. v. American Norit Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Gage v. WimberleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Moffitt v. HiebyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Flow v. FriesenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948