Legal Opinion
United States v. Hollenbeck
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided June 25, 1996No. 5:96-cv-00497PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MUNSON, Senior District Judge.
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
Presently before the court is defendant’s second pro se motion to reduce his sentence of incarceration. The first motion was predicated on the retroactive amendment by the United States Sentencing Commission of the guideline method for measuring the metric quantity of marihuana yielded by a marihuana plant. Memorandum-Decision & Order (“MDO”), Document (“Doc.”) 21. 1 Familiarity with that motion and the decision therein is assumed. The instant motion has been decided on submission.
I. BACKGROUND
On May 3, 1995 defendant pled guilty to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Gregory Branum v. Clifford Clark, David Hanson, Paul Szarmach, George Stein, and Ross GeogheganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Mark Labounty v. Stephen G. Adler, E. Carrillo, Walter A. Burdge, J. Grigioni, and All Program Committee MembersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. William BokunCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Iacaboni v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- United States v. BakeasDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Darden v. Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- United States v. BurdulisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- United States v. SiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996