Legal Opinion

James v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1896No. 17,829PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This is the second appeal of this cause. The first appeal was to the Appellate Court, where the judgment was reversed and the court below directed to sustain the demurrer to the complaint. Lake Erie, etc., R. R., Co. v. James, 10 Ind. App. 550. On the return of the cause to the court below, the demurrer was sustained and appellant filed an amended complaint. Appellee demurred to the amended complaint for want of facts, which was sustained, to which ruling of the court appellant excepted. The only error assigned in this court calls in question the action of the court in sustaining appellee’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Champ v. KendrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Northcutt v. BucklesIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Thomas v. Chicago & Erie Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. JamesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tuf-Tread Corp. v. KilbornIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Neyens v. FlesherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. State v. CollierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Kurtz v. PhillipsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Westport Stone Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API