Legal Opinion

SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Doe

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1995No. D-4131Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

903 S.W.2d 347 (1995)

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc., Petitioners,

v.

Jane DOE, Respondent.

No. D-4131.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Argued March 8, 1994.

Decided July 21, 1995.

Elizabeth M. Fraley, R. Scott Fraley, Dallas, for petitioners.

Philip Durst, Austin, for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · HechtHecht, Justice, joined by Phillips, Chief Justice, Gonzalez, Cornyn, Enoch and Owen, Justices,

Increasingly within the past decade, the policy of employers in this country has been to screen employees and prospective employees for drug usage. Employers frequently retain independent laboratories to perform drug screening tests. This case requires us to begin to define these…

3Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Centeq Realty, Inc. v. SieglerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cathey v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API