Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 11, 1973No. 73-338Published

1Per curiam

Appellant, defendant in the trial court, seeks review of a judgment and sentence of eighteen months in the state penitentiary for buying, receiving or concealing stolen property.

Three points are raised by appellant for our consideration: (1) the testimony of the district operating manager of the Firestone Tire and Rubber Company was inadmissible hearsay; (2) the evidence was insufficient to prove that tires found in defendant’s home were those stolen from Firestone’s private siding; and (3) the evidence was insufficient to prove defendant’s guilty knowledge that tires he purchased were stolen.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Romanello v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. Ard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  3. Costantino v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API