Legal Opinion
Romanello v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 4, 1964No. E-106PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
160 So.2d 529 (1964)
Mike ROMANELLO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. E-106.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.
February 4, 1964.
Rehearing Denied February 28, 1964.
A.K. Black, Lake City, for appellant.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and A.G. Spicola, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
STURGIS, Chief Judge.
The appellant, Mike Romanello, was jointly indicted with one John Aaron Peacock upon a charge of breaking and entering the dwelling of another with intent to commit grand larceny. He was separately tried by jury, convicted and adjudged guilty, hence this appeal. We…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Upshaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- George Herman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Montgomery v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- Barton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- City of Miami v. NelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Singleton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.