SEYMOUR NATIONAL BANK, ADMR. v. Heideman
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtAx, J.
This is an action instituted by appellants against the appellee for the purpose of obtaining a declaratory judgment on the question of whether any part of the Federal Estate Tax in the estate of Frank H. Heideman, deceased, should be borne by the widow where the entire amount of the property passing to the widow, except the widow’s support allowance, qualifies for marital deduction under the Internal Revenue Code.
The facts were entirely admitted by the pleadings and are undisputed.
Appellants’ complaint, omitting formal parts, reads as follows:
1. The plaintiff, The Seymour National Bank, as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Riggs v. Del DragoSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Young Men's Christian Assn. of Columbus v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Pitts v. HamrickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- Lincoln Bank & Trust Co. v. HuberCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
- Amoskeag Trust Co. v. Trustees of Dartmouth CollegeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of Estate of BovairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Caroline C. Doetsch v. Lawrence Doetsch, Individually Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Farley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Stoner v. CUSTER, EXTR.Indiana Supreme Court · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.