Hegard v. California Insurance
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Plumas County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The action was brought on a policy of fire insurance to recover the loss sustained by the burning of the insured building. The further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
It is urged by respondent that the proceedings in the court below for a new trial were not within the time allowed by law therefor, and that in consequence thereof we should consider only the judgment roll on this appeal. It is sufficient to say in answer to this proposition that no objection was made in the court below to the proposed bill of exceptions, or to the hearing of the motion for a new trial. The appellant prepared and served its proposed bill of exceptions; the respondent, without objection, proposed amendments thereto. The court, without objection, settled the bill, fixed a time…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gray v. NunanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by6 opinions
- Steve v. Bonners Ferry Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1907
- Smith ex rel. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. Allemannia Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920
- Federoff v. Birks Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.