Grisham v. Grisham
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
The appellants question the decree overruling their demurrer to the bill as last amended because (1) the amendment renders the bill multifarious and (2) the amend ment makes it a statutory bill to quiet title with insufficient allegations to this end.
The bill was one to sell lands for division :among joint owners and tenants in common, •and by amendment brought in Miss.N. L. •Grisham, alleging that she claimed or was reputed to claim some right, title, or interest in the land and called upon her to propound to the court whatever interest she claimed.
The demurrer was properly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sandlin v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Brown v. FeaginSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Thomas v. SkeggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Smith v. ColpackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Bean v. NorthcuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ellis v. StickneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Luker v. HydeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Moore v. FosheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Henslee v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Ray v. BrewerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.