Legal Opinion

State v. Nodland

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1992No. Cr. 920036PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

Randolph Nodland appeals from a county court criminal judgment and jury verdict finding him guilty of driving a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of .10 percent or greater. We conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in denying Nodland’s motion for a continuance, and we reverse and remand for a new trial.

On April 27, 1991, Duane Armstrong, North Dakota Highway Patrol, arrested Nodland for driving with a blood alcohol concentration of at least .10 percent and driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, in violation of § 39-08-01,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SchwalkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hospital Services, Inc. v. BrooksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. LinceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. GanjeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Lewis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. EbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Flattum-Riemers v. Peters-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Broeckel v. MooreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hoffner v. Bismarck Public School DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API