Legal Opinion

Ex Parte State Ex Rel. State of Ohio

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 16, 1998No. 1962017PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In State ex rel. State of Ohio v. E.B.M., 718 So.2d 665 (Ala. 1996) (which adequately sets out the facts in this case), this Court reversed the Court of Civil Appeals' January 5, 1996, decision in State ex rel. State of Ohio v. E.B.M., 718 So.2d 663 (Ala.Civ.App. 1996). We held that in order for one to bring an action seeking child support payments under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act ("URESA"), Ala. Code 1975, § 30-4-80 et seq., it is not necessary that a separate paternity action be filed under the Alabama Uniform Parentage Act ("UPA"), Ala. Code 1975, § 26-17-1 et seq.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smiths Water Auth. v. City of Phenix CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Johnson v. Life Ins. Co. of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Ex Parte State of California and MillenderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Bennett v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. State ex rel. E.K.D. v. M.R.W.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HealthSouth Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Systrends, Inc. v. GROUP 8760, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. State ex rel. T.L.K. v. T.K.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  4. D.S.M. v. L.M. and D.M.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  5. DRUMMOND CO., INC. v. LolleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API