Legal Opinion
Riley v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 7, 1984No. Claim No. 67151PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Claimants appeal from the denial of their motion for permission to file a late claim and dismissal of their action on the ground that the applicable statutory limitation period had expired. The claim alleges that in 1947 claimants purchased rings which had been enlarged with radioactive gold; that claimant Elizabeth Riley wore hers until January, 1965 when her left ring finger, diagnosed as cancerous, was amputated; that it was not until 1981, after hearing reports of jewelry containing radioactive gold, that they had Elizabeth Riley’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Steinhardt v. Johns-Manville Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Martin v. Edwards LaboratoriesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Jordan v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Fleishman v. LillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pearl v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Snyder v. Town Insulation, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Pearl v. The City Of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Johnson v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1986