Legal Opinion
Lonnie Brock, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. City of Cincinnati John Shirey, City Manager, Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 19, 2001No. 99-3121, 99-3584PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
This ease involves a claim by twelve canine-handling Cincinnati policemen for back pay and damages stemming from the City’s alleged failure to pay the officers adequate compensation at the overtime rate for canine-care work performed at home while off duty, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The district court determined what would have been, in its estimation, a reasonable time for the officers to spend caring for their canines, then concluded that the parties’ agreement to pay the officers straight-time compensation for approximately 17 minutes…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Alvarez v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Sharpe v. CuretonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Sharpe v. CuretonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Perez v. Mountaire Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Danny Flores v. City of San GabrielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.