Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 23, 2011No. 26283-9-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiddoway, J.

¶1 State v. Jaime, 168 Wn.2d 857, 866, 233 P.3d 554 (2010) holds that conducting a trial in a jail courtroom is inherently prejudicial and warranted only if a careful analysis of specific risks presented by a given case supports a conclusion that the security measure is necessary to further an essential state interest. Out of concern for a risk of gang violence, Michael Rodriguez was tried in a courtroom located in the basement of the Yakima County jail on charges of accomplice to first degree murder, unlawfully possessing a firearm, and tampering with a witness. After being convicted on all…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. State Of Washington, V Justin Moses And Aimee MosesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Personal Restraint Petition Of Ricky Deshawn KingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. State Of Washington v. Christopher E. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. State Of Washington v. Damien R. Davis & Marcus A. ReedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API