Legal Opinion
In Re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 3, 1997No. 1-CV-95-087. No. MDL-1057PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants Pacific Dunlop Limited and Nucleus Limited’s Motion to Dismiss (doc. 42), Defendants’ memorandum in support of the Motion to Dismiss (doc. 119), Plaintiffs’ memorandum in opposition (doc. 148) and Defendants’ reply (doc. 157).
INTRODUCTION
This case involves a discussion of the limits of personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants who own corporations that do business in the forum. Pacific Dunlop Limited (“PDL”) and Nucleus Limited (“Nucleus”) (collectively the “Australian…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Doe v. Unocal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Zinser v. Accufix Research Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Gordon v. Greenview Hospital, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re: Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust Litigation Basf Ag and Basf Coatings AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- In Re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.