Bond v. State

1. It is contended that the evidence did not support the verdict of assault with intent to murder, and that the offense of shooting at another was involved. Defendant argues that from the evidence it appears that the wound inflicted by defendánt was not the true measure to determine whether or not he was guilty of assault with intent to murder. The true rule is that if such an assault with intent to kill be made with malice upon a human being, with a weapon likely to produce death in the manner it was used at the time and under the circumstances, that, had death resulted, the defendant would…