Perryman v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, Judge.
Appellant seeks a reversal of a conviction for the offense of driving under the influence of intoxicants upon the ground that the trial court erred in charging the provisions of Code § 38-119. Appellant is correct.
"The provision of Code § 38-119 to the effect that where the party has evidence in his power and within his reach by which he may repel a claim or charge against him, and omits to produce it, there is a presumption that such charge is well founded, is not applicable in the trial of a criminal case.” Bond v. State, 68 Ga. App. 15 (2) (21 SE2d 866). In accord are Mills v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Spear v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Bond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tiller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Gannaway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977