Legal Opinion

Perryman v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 28, 1976No. 52548PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, Judge.

Appellant seeks a reversal of a conviction for the offense of driving under the influence of intoxicants upon the ground that the trial court erred in charging the provisions of Code § 38-119. Appellant is correct.

"The provision of Code § 38-119 to the effect that where the party has evidence in his power and within his reach by which he may repel a claim or charge against him, and omits to produce it, there is a presumption that such charge is well founded, is not applicable in the trial of a criminal case.” Bond v. State, 68 Ga. App. 15 (2) (21 SE2d 866). In accord are Mills v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spear v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  5. Bond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tiller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Gannaway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API