Legal Opinion
Carter v. Variflex, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 15, 2000No. CV 98-0167 WJR(RNBX)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTS V, VI, VII, AND VIII OF COUNTERCLAIMS
REA, District Judge.
I. Legal Standard for Summary Judgment Motion
Summary judgment is appropriate where no genuine issue of material fact exists and a party is entitled to prevail in the case as a matter of law. See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 250, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). The party requesting summary judgment has the initial burden to show that there are no genuine issues of material fact. See T.W. Elec. Serv. v. Pacific Elec. Contractors Assoc., 809 F.2d 626,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Watson Laboratories, Inc. v. Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Antoine L. Garabet, M.D., Inc. v. Autonomous Technologies Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2000
- Liveuniverse, Inc. v. Myspace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- DocMagic, Inc. v. Ellie Mae, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- In Re Digital Music Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.