Legal Opinion
Bradshaw v. United States District Court for Southern District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 7, 1984No. 83-7247PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Nancy Bradshaw petitions this court for a writ of mandamus compelling *516the district court to appoint counsel to represent her in her Title VII action against the San Diego Zoological Society (“Zoo”). We decline to issue the writ.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
Bradshaw filed a pro se sex discrimination action against the Zoo in 1975. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Zoo and Bradshaw appealed. This court reversed and remanded for further proceedings. See Bradshaw v. Zoological Society of San Diego, 569 F.2d 1066 (9th Cir.1978) (“Bradshaw I”).
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nancy S. Bradshaw, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Zoological Society of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Edward J. Dillon, Petition of Manley B. StrayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- J. D. Williamson, Jr. v. Paul E. Vardeman, Judge of Jackson County, and Susan StantonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- White v. United States Pipe & Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Bradshaw v. Zoological Society of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- 35 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1297, 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,623 Nancy S. Bradshaw, Individually and on Behalf of Others Who Are Similarly Situated v. United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Zoological Society of San Diego, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984