Legal Opinion
Yuma County v. Fidelity Title Guaranty Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 1922No. Civil No. 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.
Clement H. Coleman and Thomas D. Molloy, practicing attorneys at law, in the courts of this state, assigned to the plaintiff, Fidelity Title Guaranty Company, an account of theirs, for professional services against defendant, Yuma county. The plaintiff alleges the cause of action, omitting immaterial parts of the complaint, as follows:
“(3) That on or about February 1, 1915, the defendant county became involved in a dispute with Maricopa county, . . . concerning the true location of the boundary line between said counties, and the board of supervisors of the defendant county, by resolution…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Southwick v. First National Bank of MemphisNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Day v. . Town of New LotsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Anderson v. Board of Com'rs of Grant CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Sonora Bank & Trust Co. v. Compania Agricola Del Rio Mayo, S. A.Arizona Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Credit Bureau v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Hanagan v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Donahoe v. ArpaioDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012