Legal Opinion

Hanagan v. Board of County Commissioners

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1958No. 6351PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

Appellees, the District Attorney of the Fifth Judicial District, and his assistant, under a contract with the Board of County Commissioners, handled all matters pertaining to a proposed bond issue and sale of the general obligation bonds of Lea County for the construction of a court house and jail. For their services, the board agreed to pay them a fee equivalent to 1% of the proceeds of the bond issue, when and if the bonds were sold.

In due time the bonds were sold in an amount totalling $1,200,000, however, the board was advised that it had exceeded its authority in making…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ward v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State ex rel. Clancy v. HallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State v. DavidsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Delgado v. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. First Thrift & Loan Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. RobinsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Santa Rosa v. JaramilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Perea v. Board of Torrance County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. United States v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
  4. United States v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API