Legal Opinion

Adams v. Aerojet-General Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 2001No. C031323Published

1Opinion of the Court

104 Cal.Rptr.2d 116 (2001)

86 Cal.App.4th 1324

Daphne ADAMS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent.

No. C031323.

Court of Appeal, Third District.

February 7, 2001.

Review Denied May 16, 2001.[*]

Hackard, Holt & Heller, Theodore J. Holt, Gold River, Eric L. Graves, Jenny M. Fickel; Zelle & Larson, Byran M. Barber, Eric Berg, Los Angeles; Sherman, Dan, Petoyan, Salkow & Weber, Sherman, Dan & Portugal, Arthur Sherman, Los Angeles; Eisen & Johnston Law Corporation, Jay-Allen Eisen, and Marian M. Johnston, Sacramento, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Nossama…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. H. F. Ahmanson & Co. v. Salomon Brothers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API