Goldfield Consol. Mines Co. v. Richardson
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada
In Equity. Suit by the Goldfield Consolidated Mines Company and others to restrain George Richardson and others from purchasing gold ore stolen from complainants’ mines. On application for restraining order pendente lite.
1Opinion of the Court
FARRINGTON, District Judge.
It appears from the bill that each complainant owns valuable gold mines in Goldfield Mining District, Esmeralda county, Nev. These mines join, and form one continuous tract of about 473 acres. Running through this land are a number of veins rich in ores, valued at from 50 cents to several dollars per pound. This ore is of a “peculiar nature, and readily distinguishable from all other ores” found in the district or elsewhere in Nevada; the distinguishing characteristics are alleged to be well known to each defendant. Each complainant has a large number of employés…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Hale v. AllinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Bitterman v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Parker v. Winnipiseogee Lake Cotton & Woollen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of New Orleans v. Liberty Shop, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Skinner v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- International Organization v. Red Jacket Consol. Coal &. Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Goodeagle v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Daniels v. Portland Gold Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912