Legal Opinion

Blosser Co. v. Doonan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 20, 1910No. 2195PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Calhoun. September 25, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

1. The court erred in directing the jury to find the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, merely submitting to them the question of the amount of the recovery. Under the evidence submitted, there was an issue as to the nature of the custom sought to be established, as well as to whether sneh a custom in fact existed, and it was issuable whether a new contract of bailment was made by the parties at the conclusion of the original contract.

2. While a gratuitous bailee is,required to use some care and diligence for the safe-keeping of property entrusted to him, he must assent to the bailment,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davidson v. RamsbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Goodyear Clearwater Mills v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  3. Scott's v. ChestermanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  4. Southeastern Fair Asso. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API