Legal Opinion · Dissent

National Treasury Employees Union v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, United States Customs Service, Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 3, 1984No. 82-7534Published

1DissentBoochever, Circuit Judge

The Authority’s broad discretion to fashion remedies must be exercised in a manner that will carry out the policies of the Act. See 5 U.S.C. § 7105(g)(3). The Authority’s interpretations of those policies must be reasoned and supportable, Navy Public Works Center v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 678 F.2d 97, 99 (9th Cir.1982), and its actions may not be arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accord with the law. 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). Here, the Authority acted arbitrarily and gave too little weight to the policies of the Act in denying a status quo ante remedy.

W…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. PhinpathyaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API