Legal Opinion

Feltman v. Feltman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1989No. 16168PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEEGE, Circuit Judge.

Richard Feltman and Richard and Paula Feltman as guardians for their children attack SDCL 25-7-7 (child support guidelines) as violating their constitutional equal protection rights. The trial court held that the Feltmans failed to establish that SDCL 25-7-7 was unconstitutionally discriminatory. We affirm.

FACTS

Richard and Sandra Feltman were married in 1969. They were divorced on March 25, 1974. Two children were born of the marriage. As part of a separation agreement, the parties agreed that Sandra Felt-man would have custody and Richard Felt-man would pay monthly child…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Wallahan v. WallahanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Saint-Pierre v. Saint-PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Whalen v. WhalenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ochs v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Americana Healthcare Center v. RandallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re the Discipline of OrtnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Billion v. BillionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API