Legal Opinion

Bundy v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 17, 1886No. 14707PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The Reporters’ statement of the case : The facts found by the court are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Biohardson, Oh. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimant, a justice of the peace for the District of Columbia, appointed under the act of June 7, 1878, chapter 162 (1 Supp. Bev. Stat., 336), was, in the year 1883, designated by a justice of the Supreme Court of the District to discharge the duties of the judge of the police court in his absence, under the provisions of section 1047 of theBevised Statutes of the District of Columbia.

He discharged the duties by virtue of said designation forty-one days during that year, for which he claims that, under section 1048 of said statutes,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fendall v. District of ColumbiaUnited States Court of Claims · 1880
  2. Wallen v. Department of HighwaysWest Virginia Court of Claims · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. John McShain, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. Sweeney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  3. John McShain, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Edward Chalmers Sweeney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API