Legal Opinion
John McShain, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 14, 1967No. 225-61PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This contract case was referred to Trial Commissioner William E. Day, pursuant to Rule 57(a), for findings of fact and a recommendation for a conclusion of law. The commissioner has filed his report containing an opinion, proposed findings of fact, and a recommended conclusion of law. He would hold that plaintiff is not entitled to recover and therefore its petition should be dismissed. The defendant accepts the commissioner’s opinion and proposed legal conclusion, but made objections to certain of his findings. The plaintiff accepts the commissioner’s findings but excepts to his…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Dermott v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- W. E. Callahan Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
- O'TOOle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Marguerite S. McNamara v. Lincoln T. Miller, Sr. And the Riggs National Bank of Washington, D. C., Executors of the Estate of Ralph C. Tobin, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Garner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- David Jenkins and Cindy Jenkins, Individually and on Behalf of All Persons Similarly Situated v. Entergy Corporation, Entergy Services, Inc., Entergy Power Inc., and Entergy Power Marketing Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006