Legal Opinion

Cardinell v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 14, 1994No. 32, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAULIFFE, Judge.

This case involves two principal questions: did the trial judge have authority to reduce the defendant’s sentence when he did; and if not, did the State have any right to appeal that action to the Court of Special Appeals? The first question is readily answered in the negative; under the facts of this case *383the trial judge had no authority to modify the sentence. The second question is more difficult, and requires that we examine and trace a common law right of appeal of the State in criminal cases when the lower court acted without jurisdiction. It also requires that we…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. State v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1821
  4. Consumer Protection Division Office of the Attorney General v. Consumer Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Madison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Greco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Rush v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Board of License Commissioners v. Corridor Wine, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Murrell v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API