Cardinell v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
McAULIFFE, Judge.
This case involves two principal questions: did the trial judge have authority to reduce the defendant’s sentence when he did; and if not, did the State have any right to appeal that action to the Court of Special Appeals? The first question is readily answered in the negative; under the facts of this case *383the trial judge had no authority to modify the sentence. The second question is more difficult, and requires that we examine and trace a common law right of appeal of the State in criminal cases when the lower court acted without jurisdiction. It also requires that we…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- State v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1821
- Consumer Protection Division Office of the Attorney General v. Consumer Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Madison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Greco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Rush v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Board of License Commissioners v. Corridor Wine, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Murrell v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.