Legal Opinion
Camloc Fastener Corp. v. OPW Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 25, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS F. MURPHY, District Judge.
*17Plaintiff, claiming infringement of four registrations of the trade-mai k “Camloc” and unfair competition predicated on its use of that designation on its products and on alleged secondary meaning in its corporate name and abbreviations thereof, prays an injunction, accounting, treble damages, costs and counsel fees.
Jurisdiction is founded on diversity of citizenship and the requisite jurisdictional amount, and also upon the trademark laws of the United States. The Lanham Trade-Mark Act of 1946, 60 Stat. 427, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1051-1127.
In substance, plaintiff…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Standard Paint Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
- Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Tiffany Company v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Douglas Laboratories Corp. v. Copper Tan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Empresa Cubana Del Tabaco v. Culbro Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Camloc Fastener Corp. v. Opw Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Camloc Fastener Corporation v. Opw CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959