Legal Opinion

Thomasson v. Benson Hardware Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 18, 1930No. 4 Div. 515PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

Both the original and cross-bills aver that the material was sold or furnished under contract with the owner “or her agent,” but do not set out the name of the agent. The demurrer pointed out this fact, and should have been sustained. Murray v. Bessemer Lumber Co., 213 Ala. 232, 104 So. 649.

We have a line of decisions holding that, when a complaint or plea relies upon the act of an agent, the authority of the agent should be averred, Hanover Fire Ins. Co. v. Wood, 209 Ala. 380, 96 So. 250, but this seems to be unnecessary in cases of this sort, as it was held in the Murray Case, supra, that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanover Fire Ins. Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. McGeever v. Harris & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Murray v. Bessemer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. OldhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Harper v. J. & C. TRUCKING & EXCAVATINGCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. Thomasson v. Benson Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Green v. Pike Manor, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  5. Firestone v. HowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API