Legal Opinion

Firestone v. Howell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 28, 1991No. 1900039Published

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, Justice.

The sole issue in this case is whether the plaintiff, Jerry Howell, substantially complied with the provisions of § 35-11-213, Code of Alabama 1975, when establishing a lien on certain property of the Firestones. We conclude that he did, and we affirm.

Jerry Howell contracted with Gerald and Joyce Firestone to build a house for them on certain property owned by them in Rainbow City, Alabama. The original contract called for payments totalling $36,000; however, other “extras” raised the price of the house to $41,439.46. The Firestones made payments totalling $28,000, but paid no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bolton v. Barnett Lumber & Supply CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. Fowler v. MacKentepeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Harper v. J. & C. TRUCKING & EXCAVATINGCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  4. Thomasson v. Benson Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API