Legal Opinion

WASATCH MINES COMPANY v. Hopkinson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1970No. 11599Published

1Opinion of the Court

465 P.2d 1007 (1970)

24 Utah 2d 70

WASATCH MINES COMPANY, a Utah Corporation, Plaintiff, Respondent, and Cross-Appellant,

v.

William HOPKINSON, Defendant, Appellant, and Cross-Respondent.

No. 11599.

Supreme Court of Utah.

February 26, 1970.

David A. Goodwill, Salt Lake City, David H. Day, Murray, for plaintiff, respondent, and cross-appellant.

Richard R. Neslen, and Robert G. Pruitt, Jr., of Neslen & Mock, Salt Lake City, for defendant, appellant, and cross-respondent.

CALLISTER, Justice.

Plaintiff corporation (hereinafter referred to as Wasatch) initiated this action to recover the unpaid balance on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. E. M. Royle Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Deseret Livestock Co. v. SharpUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Westerfield v. CoopUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Haynes v. HuntUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Spanish Fork City v. HopperUtah Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API