Westerfield v. Coop
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRIOD, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment for back alimony and support money which had been awarded in a California divorce decree. Affirmed, with costs to plaintiff.
The California judgment was pleaded and conceded.
The Utah court applied the Utah statute of limitations to certain amounts claimed, to which no one took timely exception, and counsel for defendant, at the end of the trial, generally pleaded the statute of limitations, but not in accordance with our rules. 1 Statutes of limitation, therefore, are not pertinent on this appeal.
The Utah court took it upon itself to make findings…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Myers v. MyersUtah Supreme Court · 1923
- Todaro v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by10 opinions
- Baggs v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1974
- Riter v. CayiasUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re the Estate of EkkerUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- Scott v. ScottUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- Larsen v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.