Legal Opinion
State v. Balduc
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 12, 1994No. C7-93-1310PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment of conviction for receiving stolen property, a felony, and obstructing legal process, a misdemean- or. See Minn.Stat. §§ 609.53 and 609.50, subd. 1(1) (1990). We reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings, if any, not inconsistent with this opinion.
FACTS
In May of 1992, the St. Louis County Sheriffs Department received a report from a confidential informant (Cl) that property stolen in recent burglaries could be found at appellant Ryan Balduc’s residence in rural Carlton County. Based on this information, Deputy Dave Laurila…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Massachusetts v. SheppardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. John D. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. IngramCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Norton EngelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.