Legal Opinion

Five Star Manufacturing, Inc. v. Tanksley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 2005No. 26590PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NANCY STEFFEN RAHMEYER, Judge.

Five Star Manufacturing, Inc. (“Appellant”) appeals from the Labor & Industrial Relations Commission’s finding that David Tanksley (“Claimant”) was not discharged from his job for misconduct, and therefore *721was entitled to unemployment benefits without penalty. We affirm.

The standard of review in unemployment compensation cases is determined by section 288.210.1 It states, in pertinent part,

Upon appeal no additional evidence shall be heard. The findings of the commission as to the facts, if supported by competent and substantial evidence and in the absence of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Shelby v. Hayward Baker, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. CNW Foods, Inc. v. DavidsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Ritch v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Rapid Roberts, Inc. v. PotterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female CollegeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Freeman v. Gary Glass & Mirror, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Cotton v. Flik International Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Hise v. PNK (River City), LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Peoples v. ESI MAIL PHARMACY SERVICES, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API