Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Toma v. Corrigan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2001No. 2000-2196PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St. 3d 589.] THE STATE EX REL. TOMA, APPELLANT, v. CORRIGAN, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Toma v. Corrigan,

2001-Ohio-1289.] Prohibition—Writ sought to prohibit judge of common pleas court, probate division, from proceeding in a probate case—Court of appeals’ denial of writ affirmed, when. (No. 00-2196—Submitted July 17, 2001—Decided August 22, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 78316. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} In March 1999, the ancillary administrator of the estate of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Joyce v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Goldstein v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. United States v. Swiss American Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Dann v. Bulgartabac Holding Group, 07ap-177 (12-18-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Alicea v. Welch, Unpublished Decision (7-16-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Baker v. GreenleeOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State ex rel. Studgions v. SaffoldOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API