Legal Opinion

Barentine v. Gleghorn Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 2, 1973No. 5-6217PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

The only issue on this appeal is whether appellant’s disability is a result of an occupational disease as defined by our Workmen’s Compensation Law. By stipulation the claim is barred as an accidental injury by the statute of limitations, Ark. Stat. Ann. § 81-1318 (1960 Repl.). It is agreed that appellant, a bookkeeper, suffers from Tardy Ulnar Neuritis, a disability resulting for repeated pressure upon appellant’s elbow and ulnar nerve, and that the disability arose in the course and scope of her employment. However, the commission unanimously affirmed the referee’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. Holston Defense CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Buck & Simmons Auto & Electric Supply Co. v. KestersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Smith v. Tennessee Furniture Industries, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tri State Insurance v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Tri-State Ins. Co. v. EMPLOYERS MUT. LIABILITY INS. CO.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Mohawk Tire & Rubber Co. v. BriberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API