Legal Opinion

People v. Passet

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of two counts of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [3], [9]), defendant contends that County Court erred in imposing consecutive determinate terms of imprisonment of six years on each assault count. We disagree. “The imposition of consecutive sentences was not illegal since each assault was a separate and distinct act” (People v Harmon, 264 AD2d 941, 942), nor did the first assault constitute a material element of the second assault(see, Penal Law § 70.25 [2]; People v…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. HidalgoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. People v. LaureanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Turley v. Star Gazette NewspaperNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. People v. HarmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. CraneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. DupontAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API