Legal Opinion

Robert C. Switzer v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 9, 1958No. 13948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court denying, after a trial de novo under 35 U.S.C. § 145, patentability of a visible penetrant method of non-destructive testing, a method by which the existence and location of minute cracks and flaws may be readily detected. The ground for the denial in the District Court was that the subject matter of the claims was nonpatentable over prior art and patents, and, in the case of one of the claims (No. 11), unpatentable on the ground of double patenting. The Primary Examiner and the Board of Patent Appeals had reached the same conclusion. 1

An…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Esso Standard Oil Company v. Sun Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  2. Standard Oil Development Co. v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  3. Application of Richard A. Ward and Robert C. SwitzerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Switzer v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API