Thomsen v. Thomsen
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
ELLISON, J., pro tem.
In this action the trial court granted an interlocutory decree of divorce to the plaintiff on the ground of defendant’s cruelty and made a decree adjusting the property rights of the parties. Upon this appeal the defendant claims that in the decree too much of the property was awarded to the plaintiff.
A brief narrative of some facts disclosed by the record will be sufficient to present the .point raised. The plaintiff and defendant intermarried in 1876. At the time of this marriage the plaintiff was possessed of some property. By hard work, economy, and thrift their…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Eslinger v. EslingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by12 opinions
- Arnold v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- McKannay v. McKannayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Crouch v. CrouchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Caldwell v. CaldwellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Quagelli v. QuagelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.