Legal Opinion

City of San Francisco v. Randall

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,837PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Fifteenth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Dwinelle, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Department No. 2, Myrick, J.:

This is an action commenced by the City and County of San Francisco against Randall and McCann, to recover $29,000 on five bail bonds given for the release of one John Tyler from custody on five alleged criminal charges. In four instances the charge was embezzlement; in the other, conspiracy. The complaint counts upon each bond, viz: 1st, Embezzlement, $15,000; *4092nd, Embezzlement, $5,000 ; 3rd, Conspiracy, $5,000; 4th, Embezzlement, $2,000; 5th, Embezzlement, $2,000.

The said Tyler was arrested November 17th, 1877, upon warrants issued from the Police Judge’s Court…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. OliveriaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Whiteaker v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. State v. LagoniMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Malheur County v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. People v. Stuyvesant Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API