Legal Opinion

Bank of Poneto v. Kimmel

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1929No. 13,060PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEnloe, J.

This action was to recover an alleged balance of money held by the appellant bank, of money alleged by appellee to have been placed upon deposit with appellant in his checking account. Pending trial of the cause, the said bank was placed in the hands of William A. Kunkel, Jr., as receiver, and, by an amended complaint, he was also named as a party defendant. .

The cause being at issue, was submitted to a jury, which returned a verdict for appellee in the sum of $25,000, and from the judgment rendered thereon this appeal is prosecuted. The only error properly assigned is the action of the court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. . RentzNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. First National Bank v. PeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Fletcher American National Bank v. Crescent Paper Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Lewis v. EnglandWyoming Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Cargill v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kimmel v. CaptainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Wininger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State v. HuelettWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. HuelettWashington Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API