Legal Opinion
Manos v. Geissler
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 18, 2005No. 02 Civ. 9760(WCC)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Patti Manos commenced the present action against defendants Maurice Geissler, BRG Automotive Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Midas Auto Service Experts (“BRG”) and Midas International Corp. (“Midas”), (collectively, the “defendants”), alleging claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., and the New York State Human Rights Law (“NYSHRL”), N.Y. Exec. Law §§ 290 et seq. Plaintiff also asserts claims against Geissler and BRG for breach of a settlement agreement entered into between the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hirsch v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Glus v. G. C. Murphy Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- GEM Advisors, Inc. v. Corporación Sidenor, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Kalin v. Xanboo, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Senecal v. B.G. Lenders Service LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Singh v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RabinerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.