Legal Opinion

Halo Sales Corp. v. City and County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1971No. S. F. 22824Published

1Opinion of the Court

6 Cal.3d 164 (1971)

490 P.2d 1161

98 Cal. Rptr. 473

HALO SALES CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. S.F. 22824.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

December 1, 1971.

COUNSEL

Tuckman, Wertheimer & Phillips, Tuckman & Phillips and Charles W. Tuckman for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorney, and John J. Doherty, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

McCOMB, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment, which ordered dismissal of its action (brought pursuant to § 5138 of the Rev. & Tax.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Hooven & Allison Co. v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. May v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Waring v. MayorSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API