Legal Opinion

Blades v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Tbe appeal raises no question whether the land described in the subsequently executed deed, marked “Exhibit B,” comes under the provisions of the purported trust under the deed designated “Exhibit A.” The question for our decision is whether the latter instrument creates a valid trust, empowering the grantees of the legal estate, as trustees, to convey the lands concerned with this controversy in fee. We are of the opinion that it does, and so hold.

The appellant presents the view that the persons to whom the legal title’has been committed in trust are the identical persons made beneficiaries…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sturgis v. Citizens National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Johnson v. MullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Washington Furniture Co. v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Horlick v. SidleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Boyd v. . ReddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PopeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Mosler Ex Rel. Simon v. DRUID HILLSCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Miller v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Spies v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1949
  5. Stuart v. StuartCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API