Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Stuart

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided April 22, 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Bramhall, Vice-Chancellor:

Under subsections (1) and (2) of item Third (b) of the last will and testament of Robert D. Stuart, he directed that a trust be set up for the benefit of his son, Joseph Stuart, 2d, for life. The trustee was directed to invest the principal and to accumulate the net income until the life tenant should reach the age of 55, at which time the net income from the trust was made payable to the life tenant for life. The trustee was further authorized to expend such portion of the principal as might be necessary to provide for any serious illness or accident to the life…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Claflin v. ClaflinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Taylor v. CrossonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1916
  3. Equitable Trust Co. v. SnaderCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1930
  4. Hilmes v. MoonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Wilson v. LinderIdaho Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stuart v. StuartCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API